The NPT in the Third Nuclear Age: Reassessing the Treaty’s Relevance amid Emerging Realities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61732/bj.v4i2.252Keywords:
Disarmament, Nuclear Modernization, New Nuclear Age, National Interest, NPTAbstract
The NPT, once considered a cornerstone of arms control and disarmament, is under increasing strain as the Third Nuclear Age dawns, characterized by technological developments, doctrinal changes, and renewed great-power competition among nuclear-weapon states. From a realist perspective, the paper aims to contend that the core commitment of NPT regarding disarmament pledges, cooperative security, and peaceful nuclear technology sharing as nuclear-weapon states pursue nuclear modernization amidst a relative power struggle. The credibility and effectiveness of NPT have been undermined in the Third Nuclear Age amid strategic mistrust, power asymmetries, and states' technological hedging. The NPT was negotiated and evolved into a discriminatory treaty, and the P5 countries have exhibited bias in their responses when any state has challenged the NPT provisions. Nevertheless, the P5 states have prioritized their national interests over treaty commitments. The deadlock in the NPT review conferences also highlights the growing strategic mistrust between nuclear haves and have-nots. In this context, this paper will adopt a qualitative approach, drawing on both primary and secondary data, to examine key state behaviors, particularly those of P5 countries, vis-à-vis their disarmament pledges and nuclear modernization. The paper uses a case study approach to assess the shift in commitment of nuclear-weapon states during the recent 12-day war in the Middle East. The paper aims to explore the relevance of the NPT in the New Nuclear Age as states witness technological shifts and growing strategic mistrust between P5.
Downloads
References
“NPT,” The Nuclear Threat Initiative, July 19, 2025, https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/treaty-on-the-non-proliferation-of-nuclear-weapons/.
“NPT,” The Nuclear Threat Initiative.
“Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, 2025, https://disarmament.unoda.org/en/our-work/weapons-mass-destruction/nuundersafeguards.clear-weapons/treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons.
Jayantha Dhanapala and Tariq Rauf, “Reflections on the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” SIPRI, accessed December 1, 2025.
Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1978), 4–15.
Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979), 88–101.
Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better,” Adelphi Papers no. 171 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1981), 1–27.
George H. Quester, Nuclear First Strike: Consequences of a Broken Taboo (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), 67–89.
John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, updated ed. (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014), 21–22.
“Nuclear Risks Grow as New Arms Race Looms—New SIPRI Yearbook out Now,” SIPRI, June 16, 2025, https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2025/nuclear-risks-grow-new-arms-race-looms-new-sipri-yearbook-out-now.
Thomas C. Schelling, Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966), 22–28.
Scott D. Sagan, “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb,” International Security 21, no. 3 (Winter 1996–97): 54–86.
Darya Dolzikova and Matthew Savill, “Operation Rising Lion: The First 72 Hours,” RUSI, June 16, 2025, https://www.rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/operation-rising-lion-first-72-hours.
“How Humanitarian Law Applies to Armed Conflict and Nuclear Power Plants,” International Committee of the Red Cross, September 2, 2022, https://www.icrc.org/en/document/how-ihl-applies-to-conflict-nuclear-power-plants.
Tayyaba Khurshid, “Iran’s Nuclear Sites under Fire: What It Means for Pakistan,” The Diplomat, June 26, 2025, https://thediplomat.com/2025/06/irans-nuclear-sites-under-fire-what-it-means-for-pakistan/.
Ali Zia Jaffery, “Israel’s Strikes on Iran: A Big Blow to the NPT,” Pakistan Politico, June 16, 2025, https://pakistanpolitico.com/npt/.
“Statute,” International Atomic Energy Agency, https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/statute.pdf.
“Communication from the Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the Agency,” INFCIRC/1300, IAEA, June 2025, https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/2025/infcirc1300.pdf.
Andrew Futter et al., The Global Third Nuclear Age (Routledge, 2025), 11–12.
James M. Acton, “Escalation through Entanglement: How the Vulnerability of Command-and-Control Systems Raises the Risks of an Inadvertent Nuclear War,” International Security 43, no. 1 (August 2018): 56–99.
Daryl G. Kimball, “Russia Revises Nuclear Use Doctrine,” Arms Control Association, December 2024, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2024-12/news/russia-revises-nuclear-use-doctrine.
Vipin Narang, Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era (Princeton University Press, 2015).
Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960), 187–203.
Amy J. Nelson, “The Death of the INF Treaty Has Lessons for Arms Control,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, November 4, 2019, https://thebulletin.org/2019/11/the-death-of-the-inf-treaty-has-lessons-for-arms-control/.
“China Again Declines to Join Arms-Control Talks with U.S., Russia,” Radio Free Europe, June 10, 2025, https://www.rferl.org/a/china-again-declines-to-join-arms-control-talks-with-u-s-russia/30663036.html.
Nina Tannenwald, “Emerging Risks and Declining Norms in the Age of Technological Innovation and Changing Nuclear Doctrines,” American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2016.
Frank A. Rose, “The End of an Era? The INF Treaty, New START, and the Future of Strategic Stability,” Brookings, February 12, 2019, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-end-of-an-era-the-inf-treaty-new-start-and-the-future-of-strategic-stability/.
James M. Acton, Escalation through Entanglement: How the Vulnerability of Command-and-Control Systems Raises the Risks of an Inadvertent Nuclear War (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2018), https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2019/04/escalation-through-entanglement-how-the-vulnerability-of-command-and-control-systems-raises-the-risks-of-an-inadvertent-nuclear-war.
Fiona S. Cunningham and M. Taylor Fravel, “Assuring Assured Retaliation: China’s Nuclear Posture and U.S.-China Strategic Stability,” International Security 40, no. 2 (2015): 7–50, https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article-abstract/40/2/7.
Vipin Narang and Scott D. Sagan, The Fragile Balance of Terror (Cornell University Press, 2023), 1–9, https://d119vjm4apzmdm.cloudfront.net/open-access/pdfs/9781501767036.pdf.
Shannon Kile, “Nuclear Arms Control and Non-Proliferation,” SIPRI, accessed December 1, 2025, https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/YB07%20477%2012.pdf.
Siddharth Ramana, “The Nuclear Suppliers Group Waiver,” BASIC, September 29, 2008, https://basicint.org/publications/siddharth-ramana/2010/nuclear-suppliers-group-waiver.
Thomas C. Schelling, Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966), 221–240.
Barry Buzan and Eric Herring, The Arms Dynamic in World Politics (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1998), 79–101.
“2015 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” United Nations, 2015, https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2015/.
“Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Tenth Review Conference (2022),” United Nations, 2022, https://meetings.unoda.org/npt-revcon/treaty-non-proliferation-nuclear-weapons-tenth-review-conference-2022.
Alicia Sanders-Zakre and Daryl G. Kimball, “The Necessity of a Meaningful Action Plan on Article VI of the NPT,” Arms Control Association, August 5, 2022, https://www.armscontrol.org/events/2022-08/necessity-meaningful-action-plan-article-vi-npt.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tayyaba Khurshid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgement is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions. The published article is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License. “A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created” Wikipedia.
The BTTN Journal is an International, Open Access, and Peer-Reviewed Research Journal published by Balochistan Think Tank Network and licensed under CC BY 4.0.