Contesting Connectivity: India’s Discourse on CPEC and Its Impact on Sino-Indian Strategic Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61732/bj.v4i1.167Keywords:
CPEC, Strategic Narrative, South Asian Geo-Politics, Sino-Indian Relations, Media Discourse AnalysisAbstract
India has been very critical of Chinese investment in South Asia, especially in Pakistan, citing concerns about its sovereignty and the growing influence of China through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Indian media, in synergy with official claims, has raised concerns regarding the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) by a false argument that the project key artery passes through a disputed region of Gilgit Baltistan, only to minimize the rising Chinese influence in the region. . . . In this regard, the study focuses on three main questions: the impact of Indian media discourse on Sino-Indian relations, India’s rationale behind the proliferation of anti-CPEC discourse, and the implications on Sino-Indian relations as a result of India’s continuous opposition to CPEC. To find answers to these research questions, the study employs the discourse analysis framework, which analyzes the Indian media content in line with New Delhi’s policy line concerning CPEC since the project’s announcement.
Downloads
References
Saleh Shahriar, “The Belt and Road Initiative: What Will China Offer the World in Its Rise,” Asian Journal of Political Science 27, no.1 (2019): 152–56. doi:10.1080/02185377.2019.1594324.
Manjari Chatterjee Miller, "China and the Belt and Road Initiative in South Asia," Council on Foreign Relations, June 02, 2022, https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/Miller-ChinaBRISouthAsia.pdf.
Waseem Ishaque, Syed Jawad Shah and Muhammad Adeel ur Rehman, “Geo-Politics of China - Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC),” NDU Journal 32, no.1 (2017): 211–227, doi: https://ndujournal.ndu.edu.pk/site/article/view/177
Khalid Mehmood Alam, Zuemei Li, and Saranjam Baig, "Impact of Transport Cost and Travel Time on Trade under China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)," Journal of Advanced Transportation 1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7178507.
J.C. Alexander et all, The Micro-Macro Link (University of California Press, 1987).
N. Fairclough & R. Wodak, “Critical Discourse Analysis,” in Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. T. van Dijk (London: Sage, 1997).
Roger Fowler, Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press (Routledge, 1991).
Dianna R. Mullet, “A General Critical Discourse Analysis Framework for Educational Research,” Journal of Advanced Academics 29, no. 2 (2018).
Merlijn van Hulst, et al., “Discourse, Framing and Narrative: Three Ways of Doing Critical, Interpretive Policy Analysis,” Critical Policy Studies 19, no.1 (2024): 74–96, doi:10.1080/19460171.2024.2326936.
Benjamin Barton, “Leveraging the ‘String of Pearls’ for Strategic Gains? An Assessment of the Maritime Silk Road Initiative’s (MSRI) Economic/Security Nexus in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR),” Asian Security 17, no.2 (2020): 216–35. doi:10.1080/14799855.2020.1844664.
Abdul Waheed, Adil Khan, Muhammad Ejaz, “Revocation of Article 370 of Indian Constitution Implications for Regional Peace,” Pakistan Journal of International Affairs 5, no.2 (2022): 223-236, doi: https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v5i2.430.
Ashish Shukla, "Recent Developments in Gilgit Baltistan," Indian Council of World Affairs, March 19, 2019, https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=1&ls_id=2727&lid=2023.
Masud Ahmed Khan, "The Gilgit Game, Then and Now," The Karakoram, February 20, 2023, https://thekarakoram.com.pk/the-gilgit-game-then-and-now/#:~:text=Gilgit%2DBaltistan%20was%20important%20in,Gilgit%20was%20fulcrum%20of%20Asia.
B Raman, hina Pre-empts India's Possible use of the Gilgit Baltistan Card," Indian Defence Review, May 1, 2013, https://indiandefencereview.com/china-pre-empts-indias-possible-use-of-the-gilgit-baltistan-card/.
Sajjad Ahmad, "History: The Gilgit Baltistan Conundrum," Dawn, November 1, 2020, https://www.dawn.com/news/1587950#:~:text=In%201935%2C%20the%20British%20took,British%20abruptly%20cancelled%20the%20lease.
Prateek Joshi, "Who is Responsible for the Gilgit Baltistan Dispute," The Diplomat, March 29, 2017, https://thediplomat.com/2017/03/who-is-responsible-for-the-gilgit-baltistan-dispute/.
Haseeb Bhatti, "SC Restores GB Order 2018, Tells govt to ensure equal rights for region's people," Dawn, August 08, 2018, https://www.dawn.com/news/1425749.
Saroj Kumar Arya, and Sania Muneer, “Geopolitics, Conflict and Narratives: An Assessment of Kashmir Conflict after the Abrogation of Article 370,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 60, no.2 (2023): 1310-1324, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231192318 .
"Manifesto, Bharatiya Janata Party," BJP, https://www.bjp.org/bjp-manifesto-2024.
Ershad Mahmud, "India's Intentions for AJK and GB," The News International, November 17, 2022, https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1010636-india-s-intentions-for-ajk-and-gb.
Deeptiman Tiwary, "Need to Factor in our 106km Border with Afghanistan," Times of India, May 23, 2015, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Need-to-factor-in-our-106km-border-with-Afghanistan-NSA/articleshow/47391553.cms.
"Response to Media," Ministry of External Affairs, India, November 01, 2020, https://www.mea.gov.in/response-to-queries.htm?dtl/33159/official+spokespersons+response+to+media+queries+on+remarks+by+pakistani+prime+minister+in+gilgit+today+regarding+his+governments+decision+to+accord+provisional+provincial+status+to+the+socalled+gilgitbaltistan.
“Indian minister speaks of annexing Gilgit-Baltistan,” Dawn News, October 22, 2022, https://www.dawn.com/news/1717261.
Siddharth Kaushik, “Jawaharlal Nehru and Narendra Modi,” World Affairs 25, no. 3 (2021): 60-83.
Dhirendra Kumar, “Bangladesh dollar trade to be hit by India’s port restrictions, may lose $770 million,” Mint, May 18, 2025, https://www.livemint.com/economy/india-bangladesh-port-restrictions-dhaka-dollar-trade-770-million-loss-china-11747564668074.html.
Yogesh Joshi, Nishant Rejeev, and Wini Fred Gurung, "India and the World in Modi's Second Term," Institute of South Asian Studies, 2020, https://www.isas.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/India-and-the-World-in-Modis-Second-Term-Full.pdf.
Jehanzaib Ghalib and Ahmad Khan, “Dominance via Diplomacy: Analysing India’s Assertive Regional Strategy in South Asia,” Journal of Security & Strategic Analyses 11, no. 1 (2025): 1, https://doi.org/10.57169/jssa.0011.01.0352.
Chilamkuri Raja Mohan, "India and South Asia: The Elusive Sphere of Influence," Institute of South Asian Studies, January 6, 2022, https://www.isas.nus.edu.sg/papers/india-and-south-asia-the-elusive-sphere-of-influence/.
"China's Influence on Conflict Dynamics in South Asia," USIP, December 16, 2020, https://www.usip.org/publications/2020/12/chinas-influence-conflict-dynamics-south-asia.
Derek Grossman, “India is Pushing Back against China in South Asia,” RAND, August 21, 2023, https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/08/india-is-pushing-back-against-china-in-south-asia.html.
“Why is 'India Out' campaign simmering in Bangladesh after Maldives?” Geo News, April 03, 2024, https://www.geo.tv/latest/537786-why-is-india-out-campaign-simmering-in-bangladesh-after-maldives.
Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, “From net security provider to ‘Preferred Security Partnerships’: The Rhetoric, Reality and Result of India’s Maritime Security Cooperation.” Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 18, (2022): 87–98. doi:10.1080/19480881.2022.2118191.
Nazish Bhutta and Arshad Ali, ”India's Maritime Strategy and Its Implications for Pakistan,” Journal of Contemporary Studies 12, no. 1 (2023): 17-32, doi: https://doi.org/10.54690/jcs.v12i1.243.
“Modi, Godi Media and Media Freedom,” Business Recorder, May 8, 2023, https://www.brecorder.com/news/40240834.
Masroor Khanum, “CPEC and the Narratives of States and Media,” Pakistan Journal of International Affairs 4, no.1 (2021): 632-646, doi, https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v4i1.158.
David Brewster, "India Plays the Balochistan Card with China," The Interpreter, August 22, 2016, https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/india-plays-balochistan-card-china.
Azmat Ullah and Muhammad Anwar, “China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): A Paradigm Shift in Power Politics,” Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 28, No. 2 (Autumn 2020): 179-196.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Ahmad Khan, Sardar Jehanzaib Ghalib
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgement is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions. The published article is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License. “A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created” Wikipedia.
The BTTN Journal is an International, Open Access, and Peer-Reviewed Research Journal published by Balochistan Think Tank Network and licensed under CC BY 4.0.