Navigating Power Dynamics: Middle Powers and their Role in Asia-Pacific Rivalry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61732/bj.v4i1.159Keywords:
Middle Powers, Indo-Pacific, ; Great Powers, Stability, Cooperation, MultilateralismAbstract
Great power rivalry between China and US has focused on the Asia-Pacific area because of its dynamic geopolitical and economic environment. In light of best-known theories liberalism, constructivism and realism, this article examines role of middle powers, either they act as agents of stability or pawns in great power rivalry? The role of middle powers is examined by using a descriptive method. An overview of recent developments in Asia-Pacific in light of security, trade and diplomacy is analysed with illustrating case studies of middle power Quad countries Australia, Japan and India; and non-Quad countries Vietnam, Indonesia and South Korea. The findings show that middle powers are managing dynamics of great power rivalry and they successfully serve as stabilising agents in region. We assert that their policies are shaped by external pressures from great powers, however; middle powers often work to maintain regional stability through multilateral and regional partnerships. A platform Asia-Pacific Union (APU) based on region issues that would be free from influence of greater powers is recommend to achieve regional stability. However, a study to analyze the potential capabilities of middle powers as passive or active mediator for achieving issued based multidomain cooperation is also suggested.
Downloads
References
Korea JoongAng Daily, “Korea, U.S. and Japan Carry Out First Trilateral Air Drill Since President Lee Took Office,” Korea JoongAng Daily, June 18, 2025, https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/2025-06-18/national/defense/Korea-US-and-Japan-carry-out-first-trilateral-air-drill-since-President-Lee-took-office/2333023.
Courier Mail, “On Board US Assault Ship as Navies Ink Pacific Security Pact,” Courier Mail (Australia), July 11, 2025.
Christopher Woody, “Japan Steps Up New Security Assistance to Countries Caught Between US and China,” The Diplomat, July 8, 2025, https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/japan-steps-up-new-security-assistance-to-countries-caught-between-us-and-china/.
Stewart Hynd and Raju Jan Singh Thomas, Indo-Pacific Middle Powers: Rethinking Roles and Preferences (Honolulu, HI: Pacific Forum, 2023), PacNet 43.
Modern Diplomacy, “Ripple Effects of the China Cook Islands Pact: Pacific Security & Indonesia’s Strategic Moves,” Modern Diplomacy, March 15, 2025, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/03/15/ripple-effects-of-the-china-cook-islands-pact-pacific-security-indonesias-strategic-moves/
Evelyn Goh, “Contesting Hegemonic Order: China in East Asia,” Security Studies 28, no. 3 (2019): 614–644.
Stephen R. Nagy, “Middle Power Alignment in the Indo-Pacific: Securing Agency through Neo-Middle Power Diplomacy,” East Asia Security Centre 东亚安全中心 1, no. Middle Power Conference Papers (2020): 1–14.
F. W. T. Yang, “Asymmetrical Interdependence and Sanction: China’s Economic Retaliation over South Korea’s THAAD Deployment,” Issues & Studies 55, no. 4 (2019): 1940008.
E. Kim, Korea's Middle‐Power Diplomacy in the 21st Century, Pacific Focus 30, no. 1 (2015): 1–9.
B. Kratiuk, J. J. Van den Bosch, A. Jaskólska, and Y. Sato, Handbook of Indo-Pacific Studies (London: Taylor & Francis, 2023).
John Hobson, The State and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965).
Dong-min Shin, “Concept of Middle Power and the Case of the ROK: A Review,” in Korea Yearbook 2012: Politics, Economy and Society, ed. by Patrick Flamm and Rüdiger Frank (Netherlands: Brill, 2012), 131–52.
Andrew Fenton Cooper, Richard A. Higgott, and Kim Richard Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order, vol. 6 (Vancouver: UBC Press, 1993).
Edward A. Kolodziej, Security and International Relations, vol. 10 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46, no. 2 (1992): 391–425.
Usman Safiyanu Duguri, Isyaku Hassan, and Yusuf Kamaluddeen Ibrahim, “International Relations, Realism, and Liberalism: A Theoretical Review,” International Journal of Social and Humanities Extension (IJSHE) (2022): 1–6.
Andrew F. Cooper, ed., Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War (Cham: Springer, 2016).
Jeffrey W. Meiser, “Introducing Liberalism in International Relations Theory,” in International Relations Theory, ed. Joyce P. Kaufman (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018), 22–27.
Ibid.
Adam Chapnick, “The Middle Power,” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 7, no. 2 (1999): 73–82.
John Robertson, “Middle-Power Definitions: Confusion Reigns Supreme,” Australian Journal of International Affairs 71, no. 4 (2017): 355–70.
Ralf Emmers and Say Teo, “Regional Security Strategies of Middle Powers in the Asia-Pacific,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 15, no. 2 (2015): 185–216.
Andrew Fenton Cooper, Richard A. Higgott, and Kim Richard Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order, vol. 6 (Vancouver: UBC Press, 1993).
Adam Chapnick, “The Middle Power,” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 7, no. 2 (1999): 73–82.
Choong Won Kim, “Middle Power as Unit of Analysis of International Relations: Its Conceptualizations and Implications,” Korean Journal of International Studies 49, no. 1 (2009): 7–36.
Adam Carr, “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach,” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68, no. 1 (2014): 70–84.
Alan Bryman, Social Research Methods, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 374.
M. I. K. Yousafzai and M. U. S. Faisal, “A Comprehensive Analysis on the Strategic Importance of Indo-Pacific Region in Global Politics,” Pakistan Journal of International Affairs 7, no. 3 (2024), accessed March 1, 2019.
Australian Government, Department of Defence. Defence White Paper 2013. Canberra: Department of Defence, 2013, 74.
Rory Medcalf, “Reimagining Asia: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific,” in International Relations and Asia’s Southern Tier: ASEAN, Australia, and India, 9–28 (n.p.: n.p., 2018)..
Ibid
Andrew Cottey and Robbert van der Harr, “The EU and the Indo-Pacific,” in Handbook of European Union Governance, 501–13 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025).
Ralf Emmers, “Indonesia’s Role in ASEAN: A Case of Incomplete and Sectorial Leadership,” The Pacific Review 27, no. 4 (2014): 543–62.
Donald E. Weatherbee, Re-Assessing Indonesia’s Role in the South China Sea (Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, 2016).
Jonathan E. Hillman, The Emperor’s New Road: China and the Project of the Century (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2020).
Gulshan Sachdeva, “Connectivity Strategies in the Indo-Pacific and Their Geopolitical Implications,” in Handbook of Indo-Pacific Studies, 154 (London: Routledge, 2023).
Zafar Ahmed, “Great Power Rivalry in Indo Pacific,” Strategic Studies 41, no. 4 (2021): 56–75.
Tran Phuong Thao, “Middle Powers in the Indo-Pacific,” in Handbook of Indo-Pacific Studies, 429 (London: Routledge, 2023).
CSIS, “Defining Our Relationship with India for the Next Century: An Address by U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson” (see note 9).
U.S. Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report (see note 13), 16–19.
Louisia Brooke Holland, John Curtis, and Claire Mills, “The AUKUS Agreement,” House of Commons Library, October 11, 2021, https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9335/CBP-9335.pdf.
C. Raja Mohan and Rory Medcalf, “The US-China Rivalry Has Asia on Edge: Can ‘Middle Powers’ Create Stability?” Networked Region, June 1, 2019, 4.
Seung-Chan Jung, Jiyoung Lee, and Jayeon Y. Lee, “The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US Geostrategic Competition in Indo-Pacific Region,” Journal of Contemporary China 30, no. 127 (2021): 53–68.
Deepak Sahu, “Abe’s Impact on Economic Engagement with India,” in India-Japan Partnership, 71–97 (New York: Routledge, 2024).
Bohdan Kratiuk, Jan J. Van den Bosch, Agnieszka Jaskólska, and Yukiko Sato, eds., Handbook of Indo-Pacific Studies (London: Taylor & Francis, 2023).
Christian Downie, “One in 20: The G20, Middle Powers and Global Governance Reform,” Third World Quarterly 38, no. 7 (2017): 1493–1510.
Behorizon, “Asia on the Horizon,” Beyond the Horizon International Strategic Studies Group, 2025, https://behorizon.org/asia-on-the-horizon/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
U.S. Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Free and Open Indo-Pacific (Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2019).
Takuji Taniguchi, “Should We Forget about the Asia-Africa Growth Corridor?” Lettre du Centre Asie, no. 87 (2020).
Neha Prasad, “India’s Foray into the Indo-Pacific: Embracing Ambiguity through Strategic Autonomy,” in The Modi Administration and Future of India, 123–46 (n.p., 2019).
Rory Medcalf, “Reimagining Asia: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific,” in International Relations and Asia’s Southern Tier: ASEAN, Australia, and India, 9–28 (Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).
Rahul Rajagopalan, “Evasive Balancing: India's Unviable Indo-Pacific Strategy,” International Affairs 96, no. 1 (2020): 75–93.
Don Kirk, “South Korea Delivers Setback to Somali Pirates and a Warning to North Korea,” The Christian Science Monitor, January 24, 2011, https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2011/0124/South-Korea-delivers-setback-to-Somali-pirates-and-a-warning-to-North-Korea.
Thomas Wilkins, “Re-assessing Australia’s Intra-Alliance Bargaining Power in the Age of Trump,” Security Challenges 15, no. 1 (2019): 9–32.
Australian Government, Department of Defence, A Safer Australia – Budget 2018–19 Defence (Canberra: Department of Defence, 2018).
Seung-Chan Jung, Jiyoung Lee, and Jayeon Y. Lee, “The Indo-Pacific Strategy and US Alliance Network Expandability: Asian Middle Powers’ Positions on Sino-US Geostrategic Competition in Indo-Pacific Region,” Journal of Contemporary China 30, no. 127 (2021): 53–68.
Ibid.
Jean L. Dinh, “China's Dilemma in the South China Sea and the Arbitration Tribunal—Implications on China's Regional Strategy in Southeast Asia,” International Journal of China Studies 7, no. 3 (2016).
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan (MOFA), Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP), 2018, https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000430632.pdf (accessed December 15, 2019).
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan (MOFA), Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP), 2018, https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000430632.pdf (accessed December 15, 2019).
Indian Navy, Ensuring Secure Seas: Indian Maritime Security Strategy, Naval Strategic Publication (NSP) 1, no. 2 (2015): 32.
New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade (NZFAT), “Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA),” 2019, https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-concluded-but-not-in-force/digital-economy-partnership-agreement/ (accessed January 2, 2020).
Stephen Nagy, “Territorial Disputes, Trade and Diplomacy: Examining the Repercussions of the Sino-Japanese Territorial Dispute on Bilateral Trade,” China Perspectives 2013, no. 4 (2013): 49–57.
Yong Juan, Young Choi, Sung An, Chang-Ki Lee, and Sun-Jin Lee, “The Constraints of Chinese Tourists to Visit Korea Caused by THAAD Using Q-Methodology,” Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 22, no. 12 (2017): 1261–73.
Ryan Cardwell and Donald G. Brewin, “Blackleg or Blackmail? Economics of the Canada–China Canola Trade Dispute,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics / Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie 67, no. 3 (2019): 251–60.
Anirban Palit and Shinji Sano, “The United States’ Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy: Challenges for India and Japan,” Institute of South Asian Studies 524 (2018): 1–6.
Alex Hynd and Nicholas Thomas, Indo-Pacific Middle Powers: Rethinking Roles and Preferences, PacNet 43 (Honolulu, HI: Pacific Forum, 2023).
Neha Prasad, “India’s Foray into the Indo-Pacific: Embracing Ambiguity through Strategic Autonomy,” in The Modi Administration and Future of India, 123–46 (2019).
Giorgia Abbondanza, “Whither the Indo-Pacific? Middle Power Strategies from Australia, South Korea and Indonesia,” International Affairs 98, no. 2 (2022): 403–21.
Keisuke Itakura, “Evaluating the Impact of the US–China Trade War,” Asian Economic Policy Review 15, no. 1 (2020): 77–93.
Felix Heiduk and Gisela Wacker, “From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Significance, Implementation and Challenges,” SWP Research Paper, no. 3 (Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2020).
Joseph MacKay, “Rethinking the IR Theory of Empire in Late Imperial China,” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 15, no. 1 (2015): 53–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcu012.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shahram Iqbal, Muhammad Arif Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgement is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions. The published article is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License. “A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created” Wikipedia.
The BTTN Journal is an International, Open Access, and Peer-Reviewed Research Journal published by Balochistan Think Tank Network and licensed under CC BY 4.0.