Narendra Modi's Hindutva Policy: A Detailed Examination of Its Implications on Indo-Pak Diplomatic and Strategic Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61732/bj.v2i1.14Abstract
Concurrently with the rise of ultra-nationalism globally, India is undergoing a fundamental change driven by the adoption of the exclusivist Hindutva ideology. Since PM Narendra Modi assumed power in 2014, the Hindutva ideology has gained widespread acceptance and popularity, permeating all segments of Indian society and institutions, including foreign relations and cultural events. This paper examines the Hindutva ideology as a policy and its significant impact on India-Pakistan relations. The Hindutva ideology, fueled by the patronage of the government, has exacerbated the already strained relations between the two countries. It has influenced key aspects such as the abrogation of special status in Jammu and Kashmir, alleged interference in Balochistan, engagement in the Chabahar port, and the hindrance of confidence-building measures. By analyzing the Hindutva policy and its implications, this paper sheds light on the broader consequences for India-Pakistan relations, emphasizing the need for constructive dialogue, de-escalation, and regional cooperation to foster a more peaceful and cooperative future.
Downloads
References
Inayat Kalim, Syed Hussain Shaheed Soherwordi, and Areeja Syed, "Hindutva in India: Rise of Bigotry against Muslims," South Asian Studies, Vol. 2, No. 35 (December 2020), 327 – 340.
Azeem Ibrahim, “Modi’s Slide Toward Autocracy,” Foreign Policy, July 13 (2020), https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/07/13/modi-india-hindutva-hindu-nationalism-autocracy/.
Heewon Kim, "Understanding Modi and minorities: The BJP-led NDA government in India and religious minorities," India Review, Vol. 16. No. 4 (2017), 357-376.
Christophe Jaffrelot, The Hindu nationalist movement and Indian politics: 1925 to the 1990s: Strategies of Identity-building, Implantation and Mobilization (with special reference to Central India), Penguin Books India, 1999.
Chetan Bhatt, Hindu nationalism: origins, ideologies and modern myths, Routledge, 2020.
Deccan Herald, “PM Modi's parasite reference has deeply hurt farmers: Union Leaders,” Deccan Herald, February 14 (2021), https://www.deccanherald.com/national/pm-modis-parasite-reference-has-deeply-hurt-farmers-union-leaders-951014.html.
Adnan Abidi, “India: Government Policies, Actions Target Minorities,” Human Rights Watch News, February 19 (2021), https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/02/19/india-government-policies-actions-target-minorities.
Ibid.
Al-Jazeera, “Outrage after hijab-wearing woman heckled by Hindu mob in India." Al-Jazeera, February 02 (2022), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/8/schools-ordered-shut-in-india-as-hijab-ban-protests-intensify.
Anum Babur and Shaheen Akhtar, "Hindutva and Islamophobia." Strategic Studies, Vol. 41, No. 4 (2021), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.53532/ss.041.04.0041.
Gita Sahgal, "Hindutva Past and Present: From Secular Democracy to Hindu Rashtra," Feminist Dissent (2020), 19-49, https://doi.org/10.31273/fd.n5.2020.757
A Kapur Chatterjee, Kapur, “A Post-Mortem of Article 370: Constitutional Interpretation and Public Narratives in India,” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, Vol. 7, No. 3 (2020), 267-289.
Swapna Gopinath, “Gopinath, Swapna. "Historicizing Hindutva Ideology: From Ancient and Contemporary Times," Cultural Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3 (2022), 484-486.
Rakesh Shukla, “The Abrogation of Article 370: Legal, Political, and Constitutional Perspectives,” A Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 76, No. 3 (2020), 377-397.
Shibashis Chatterjee and Udayan Das, "Indian foreign policy as public history: globalist, pragmatist and Hindutva imaginations." India Review, Vol. 20, No. 5 (2021), 565-588.
Pal, “The Kashmir Imbroglio and Indian Democracy,” The Round Table, Vol. 111, No. 3 (2022), 318-331.
Ali, “State Power, the Discourse of Victimhood, and Human Rights Abuses in Indian Kashmir,” Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3 (2021), 473-491.
Muhammad Nadeem Ashraf, Sher Ali Kakar, Sikandar Azam Khan, and Ghulam Mustafa, "The Emergence of Hybrid Warfare and International Security Environment: A Case Study of Pakistan," Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, Vol.4, No. 4 (2021), 878-892, https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v4i3.316.
F. K. Lodhi, “Balochistan Unveiled: An Analysis of Baloch Insurgency and Pakistan’s Response,” South Asian Studies, Vol. 35, No.1 (2021), 189-206.
A. Ahmad, “Understanding India’s Proxy Warfare in Balochistan,” Policy Perspectives, Vol.18, No.2 (2021), 176-187.
Rana, “India's Hybrid Warfare Strategy: A Case Study of Balochistan,” Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 29, No. 1 (2022), 93-109.
Shah, & Zafar, “Balochistan and the Challenging Dynamics of Security,” Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 4 (2022), 173-188.
Varshney, “Hindutva and Indian Foreign Policy,” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 54, No. 42 (2019), 26-28.
Singh, “India’s Decision to Revoke the MFN Status for Pakistan: An Analysis,” Strategic Analysis, Vol. 44, No. 6 (2020), 561-575.
Rehman, “The Ongoing Blame Game between India and Pakistan,” South Asian Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2 (2019), 245-254.
Joshi, “Terrorism and the Indo-Pak Relations: From Conflict Escalation to Peace Process,” Pakistan Horizon, Vol. 75, No. 2 (2022), 191-208.
S. Chaudhry & M. Tanveer, “Dynamics of India-Pakistan Relations in the Post-Balakot Scenario,” Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2023), 85-100.
Ahmad Bilal Khalil, “Pakistan and China: Don’t Fear Chabahar Port, The Diplomat, (January 31, 2017), https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/pakistan-and-china-dont-fear-chabahar-port/.
DAWN, “India withdraws Most Favoured Nation status for Pakistan”, (February 15, 2019), https://www.dawn.com/news/1463999.
S. Solangi and Ali Hasan, "Development of Chabahar Port: Challenges and Implications for Pakistan and CPEC," Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2019), 48-57.
Ibid. 51
Mutahir Ahmed, “Confidence‐building Measures between Pakistan and India: An Argument for Change,” Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 7, No. 2 (1998), 137–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584939808719835.
Muhammad W. Haider and Tahir M. Azad, “The Role of Confidence-Building Measures in the Evolution of Relations between Pakistan and India,” World Affairs, Vol. 184, No. 3 (2021), 294–317.
Ibid, 300.
Anum Babur and Shaheen Akhtar, "Hindutva and Islamophobia." Strategic Studies Vol. 41, No. 4 (2021), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.53532/ss.041.04.0041.
Sana Taha, “Indian Surgical Strike: Implications and Response by Pakistan.” Islamabad Policy Research Institute, Vol. 20, No. 2 (2020), 88–117. https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.200204.
Salma Malik, “Indian surgical strike: implications and response by Pakistan,” IPRI, Vol. 20, No. 1 (2020), 72-104, https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.200104.
Ibid. 101.
Malik, “Indian surgical strike: implications and response by Pakistan,” 90.
Aman Nair and Arindrajit Basu, “Confidence-Building Measures and Norm Diffusion in South Asia,” Observer Research Foundation, February (2021), https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1805010/confidence-building-measures-and-norm-diffusion-in-south-asia/2537085/.
Britannica, “Neorealism in international relations” Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/realism-political-and-social-science/Neorealism-in-international-relations.
Caitlin Smith, “Personality in foreign policy decision-making,” E-International Relations October 16 (2012), https://www.e-ir.info/2012/10/16/personality-in-foreign-policy-decision-making/.
Firoozabadi, Jalal Dehghani, and Mojtaba Zare Ashkezari, “Neo-classical realism in international relations." Asian Social Science, Vol. 12, No. 6, May 16 (2016), 95-99, https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n6p95.
Deepa S. Reddy, Deepa S, “What is neo-about neo-Hindutva?” Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 26, No. 4, October 2 (2018), 483-490, https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2018.1548009.
Malik, “Indian surgical strike: implications and response by Pakistan,” 101.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Areeja Syed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgement is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions. The published article is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License. “A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created” Wikipedia.
The BTTN Journal is an International, Open Access, and Peer-Reviewed Research Journal published by Balochistan Think Tank Network and licensed under CC BY 4.0.