Analytical Appraisal of Space Weapons’ Probability: Imminent Detriment to the Multi-Lateral Non-Proliferation Regime and Strategic Stability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61732/bj.v3i2.139Keywords:
Anti-Satellite (ASAT) Weapon systems, Outer Space Treaty (OST), Rubicon Theory Prevention of Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS), Conference on Disarmament (CD), Prevention of Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS)Abstract
Outer Space is likely to be the contesting arena of power projection. In the times to come, the domain of space is being perceived to significantly balance or outbalance regional and global competitors' deterrence and strategic stability equations. Maximum power potential in outer space is rarely discussed. So far, space power projection has solely involved placing Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) satellites, along with battlefield communication and precision guidance for strategic weapons like anti-ballistic missiles. However, the physical placement of weapons is yet to materialize. Inactivity is ascribed to scientific and financial challenges, insufficient political and societal resolve, and an implicit accord among advanced spacefaring states. Yet, the advancing technologies in outer space sphere and strategic intents/ thoughts shared by the relevant strategic experts do indicate that the placement of physical space weapons is not a far-fetched option. Although, physical placement might be subject to delay for multiple crisscrossed limitations in strategic, technological and diplomatic terms, yet the super and major powers especially India are heavily investing in building their strategic military capacities for absolute power, if not globally at least in their respective strategic regions of influence. The article in hand is an effort to carry out an objective appraisal of the probability of the outer space getting weaponized by undertaking a detailed literature review of various relevant strategic thinkers from different regions who have opined about space being militarized or weaponized in near times.
Downloads
References
Statement by PAREP France Ambassador Camille PETIT at Conference on Disarmament (CD) on PAROS (Geneva, 28th March,2024), https://cd-geneve.delegfrance.org/Conference-on-disarmament-Statement-by-Ambassador-Camille-PETIT-on-PAROS-Geneva.
Muhammad Tehsin, “Space Weaponization and Strategic Stability in South Asia,” Global Social Sciences Review, V (I) (2020): 690.
Doris Elin Urrutia, “India's Anti-Satellite Missile Test Is a Big Deal. Here's Why,” Space.com, August 10, 2022, accessed August 8, 2024,https://www.space.com/india-anti-satellite-test-significance.html.
Ahmed Saeed Minhas, “Space Weapons: A Rapidly Evolving Threat to South Asian Strategic Balance,” NDU Journal (2018): 138.
Dominic D.P. Johnson and Dominic Tierney, “The Rubicon Theory of War: How the Path to Conflict Reaches the Point of No Return,” International Security, Volume 36, Issue 1 (2011): 7-40.
Columba Peoples, “Assuming the Inevitable: Overcoming the Inevitability of Outer Space Weaponization and Conflict,” Contemporary Security Policy 29:3(2008): 501-503.
Jackson Nyamuya Maogoto and Steven Freeland, “Space Weaponization and the United Nations Charter Regime on Force: A Thick Legal Fog or a Receding Mist,” The International Lawyer, Volume 41, No. 4 (2007): 1104.
Jakub Fučík, “Revolution in Military Affairs and Outer Space,” International Conference knowledge-Based Organization, Vol. XXIII, No 1(2017): 109.
Ahmed Saeed Minhas, “Space Militarization,” South Asia (November 2019): 33-34.
Austin Long, Deterrence: From Cold War to Long War (CA: RAND, 2008), 21-22.
Minhas, “Space Militarization,” 34.
Joseph O’Mahoney, “The Smiling Buddha Effect: Canadian and US Policy after India’s 1974 Nuclear Test,” The Nonproliferation Review, Volume 27 (2020): 2.
Michael Krepon, “Space and Nuclear Deterrence,” in Anti-Satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space Relations, ed. Michael Krepon et al. (Washington DC: Stimson Press, 2013), 16-19.
Karl P. Mueller, “The Absolute Weapon and the Ultimate High Ground: Why Nuclear Deterrence and Space Deterrence Are Strikingly Similar – Yet Profoundly Different,” in Anti-Satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space Relations, ed. Michael Krepon et al. (Washington DC: Stimson Press, 2013), 45-50.
Karl P. Mueller, “Totem and Taboo: Depolarizing the Space Weaponization Debate,” in Space Weapons Are They Needed? ed. John M. Logsdon et al. (Washington DC: The George Washington University Press, 2003).
James A. Lewis, “Reconsidering Deterrence for Space and Cyber Space,” in Anti-Satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space Relations, ed. Michael Krepon et al. (Washington DC: Stimson Press, 2013).
Bruce W. MacDonald, “Deterrence and Crises Stability in Space and Cyberspace,” in Anti-Satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space Relations, ed. Michael Krepon et al. (Washington DC: Stimson Press, 2013), 81-101.
Michael Nacht, “The United States and China in Space: Cooperation, Competition, or Both?” in Anti-Satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space Relations, ed. Michael Krepon et al. (Washington DC: Stimson Press, 2013), 102-113.
Brian Weeden, “US-China Cooperation in Space: Constraints, Possibilities, and Options,” in Anti-Satellite Weapons, Deterrence and Sino-American Space Relations, ed. Michael Krepon et al. (Washington DC: Stimson Press, 2013), 114-130.
Michael Neary, “Space: The Next Revolution in Military Affairs?” Astropolitics 10:1 (2008):103-121.
Laura Delgado Lopez, “Predicting an Arms Race in Space: Problematic Assumptions for Space Arms Control,” Astropolitics, 10:1 (2012): 49-67.
Columba Peoples, “The Securitization of Outer Space: Challenges for Arms Control,” Contemporary Security Policy, 32:1 (2011): 76-98.
Patrick K. Gleeson, “Perspective on Space Operations,” Astropolitics, 5:2 (2007): 145-172.
Lawrence Cooper, “The Strategy of Responsive Space,” Astropolitics, 1:3 (2003): 44-62.
Bruce. M. Deblois, “The Advent of Space Weapons,” Astropolitics, 1:1 (2003): 29-53.
Phillip Coyle and John Rhinelander, “Space Weapons: Alternatives for Today,” Astropolitics 2:2 (2004): 201-213.
Vishnu Anantatmula, “U.S. Initiative to Place Weapons in Space: The Catalyst for a Space-Based Arms Race with China and Russia,” Astropolitics, 11:3 (2003): 132-155.
Alan Steinberg, “Weapons in Space: The Need to Protect Space Assets,” Astropolitics, 10:3 (2012): 248-266.
William. Spacy II, “Assessing the Military Utility of Space Based Weapons,” Astropolitics, 1:3 (2003): 1-42.
Michael Martindale, “Evaluating State Willingness to Purse Space Weapons,” Defense & Security Analysis, 31:2 (2015): 1-13.
Bharath Gopalaswamy and Gaurav Kampani, “India and Space Weaponization: Why Space Debris Trumps Kinetic Energy Antisatellite Weapons as the principal Threat to Satellites,” India Review, 13:1 (2014): 40-57.
Clayton K.S. Chun, “Viewpoint: Expanding the High Frontier: Space Weapons in History,” Astropolitics, 2:1 (2004): 63-78.
David B. Thomson, A Guide to the Nuclear Arms Control Treaties (New Mexico: Los Alamos Historical Society, 2001), 56-70.
Alexei Arbator and Valdimit Dovrkin, Outer Space: Weapons, Diplomacy and Security, (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2010), 32-34.
Columba Peoples, “Assuming the Inevitable: Overcoming the Inevitability of Outer Space Weaponization and Conflict,” Contemporary Security Policy, 29:3 (2008): 502-520.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmed Saeed Minhas, Farhat Konain Shujahi, Shanzay Saeed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are permanently available online to the public without restrictions or subscription fees. All articles are free to be used, cited, and distributed, on condition that appropriate acknowledgement is included. Authors are the copyright holders of their original contributions. The published article is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons (CC) Attribution License. “A CC license is used when an author wants to give people the right to share, use, and build upon a work that they have created” Wikipedia.
The BTTN Journal is an International, Open Access, and Peer-Reviewed Research Journal published by Balochistan Think Tank Network and licensed under CC BY 4.0.